Abogado. Investigador.
La pregunta antes que la respuesta.
I study the intersections others overlook — where neuroscience meets constitutional law, where Greek philosophy informs legal anthropology, where data shapes decisions. Trained in law, practiced in operations and analytics, grounded in the discipline of asking better questions.
In law, this method becomes interdisciplinary investigation — questioning whether the Colombian Constitutional Court's foundations on human dignity are philosophically sound, integrating neurobiology where jurisprudence alone falls short.
In operations, it becomes pattern detection and process analysis — leading remote teams at Amazon, making data-driven decisions under strict deadlines, preventing abuse through analytical rigor applied to behavioral data.
In data, it becomes structured inquiry — cleaning, organizing, and visualizing information to turn noise into actionable insight, whether for marketing analytics or legal research.
In writing, it becomes argumentation — every essay, every report, every document follows the same architecture: read deeply, analyze critically, synthesize clearly, argue precisely.
Also an Anglo-Catholic priest — because the questions worth asking don't stop at disciplinary borders.
Español (native) · English (B2, working C1) · Français (A2).
Challenges the Kantian foundation of human dignity as applied by Colombia's Constitutional Court. Proposes that dignity should be grounded in concrete capacities with neurobiological substrates — deliberative autonomy, consciousness, empathy — rather than abstract metaphysical principles.
Integrates biology, neuroscience, Greek philosophy, and legal anthropology into a unified framework for understanding law as scientific epistemology. Uses Maturana's conditions of scientificity as methodological structure — arguing that legal knowledge must meet the same rigor demanded of any empirical discipline.
Read on Academia.eduEvery right is a matter of politics, and this essay aims to reflect on its implications for the actions and omissions of the Constitutional Court.
In this essay, the appeal to authority is examined from a different perspective. An idea that is grounded in the relationship between our understanding of knowledge in biology and its implications on politics.
These are selected pieces — reflections at the intersection of law, science, and everyday thinking. More writing available upon request.
End-to-end leadership of remote teams in a high-volume environment. Data analysis for operational decisions. Bridge between stakeholders, translating metrics into action under strict deadlines.
Detection of irregular behavioral patterns across accounts. Exhaustive case documentation. Analytical judgment applied to abuse prevention — where a missed pattern has real financial consequences.
Influencer profile analysis for marketing strategy. Data cleaning, structuring, and reporting in a resource-constrained startup environment. Turning limited data into decisions that mattered.
Rigorous analysis of complex legal problems. Jurisprudential review, hypothesis construction, interdisciplinary argumentation.
Legal documents, articles, essays, and reports written to publication standard. Precision over volume.
Cleaning, structuring, and visualizing data with advanced Excel — pivot tables, dashboards, VLOOKUP. Making sense of the numbers.
Content with substance, not filler. Research-backed writing for brands, platforms, and organizations that value depth.
Process design, communication frameworks, performance management. Learned at Amazon scale, applicable anywhere.
I'm interested in research collaborations, writing projects, data work, and conversations that cross disciplinary lines. If you have a problem that requires thinking before doing, I'd like to hear about it.